스코트어 hannlin rede식 순화 판본

In the warld, there are lots o leids. Even if there are manie leids,

aw o them have equallie been cheenged frae their forebeirlie leids.

The leid cheenge - Aw o leids whilk are spoken the day have gaen throo it.

Their grammatic systems are unalike frae, and their phonological systems are not sicklike tae

their awn forebeirs.

But, finding the raison why they stertet tae be cheenged is nae aisie.

Tae unnerstand this, we need tae howk intae the yearlaire o Scots leid.

Some Scots leid wappet organisations an acteevists stertet tae skeir the leid sin late 19t yearhunert.

Sae, it sometimes macks some fowk have a misunnerstanding that Scots leid is less wroght on by French

accause Scotslan is faur frae France geographicallie.

But, if ye suithlie think sae, it is hallie wrang.

The auldest record in Scots leid is "The Bruce", an we can find it oot that there are lots o French lenwirds

in "The Bruce"

Even if, there are manie hamelt Germanic wirds casting over "suithfast", 'veracious'.

it jist can be that there were still wheen Germanic wirds nae excheenged with French lenwirds.

Howiver, even at that time, Scots leid wis undergaeing the teem o French lenwirds.

Sae, the Scots leid had lots o French lenwirds, remerkablie written Scots had sae manie French lenwirds

as Inglis the day.

Then, there is a frain: why neweild Scots has less French an Latin lenwirds than middle Scots?

The answer is aisie. Scots acteevists ettled at skeiring the leid frae late 19t yearhunert.

There are guid swatches: the Nishbet Murdoch new testament written in 15t yearhunert

an the William Smith new testament in Braid Scots written in 19t yearhunert.

The William Smith version has suithlie less French lenwirds than the Nishbet Murdoch version

even though it wis wrate muckle later than the Nishbet Murdoch version.

Sae, it is kennable that some Scots acteevists stertet tae skeir the leid frae late 19t yearhunert.

In ither wirds, if ye mack a hinderending that Scots wis less wroght on by French accause o the geographie o Scotlan

jist evening with neweild Scots an neweild Inglis, it is a wrang answer.

An it shaws why finding the raison o leid cheenges anlie looking at the spit o a leid the day is wanchancie.

It can be that the raison why modren Inglis has tuft o French lenwirds.

If French ruling is the anlie factor whilk is important, why daes neweild Welsh nae have manie French lenwirds?

It alsae means that there is nae an aesome factor can red oot awthing.

The invasion o William I wis jist ane o manifauld factors whilk mad Inglis adopt lots o French lenwirds.

Even the records o Yola leid shaws that the Yola leid had mickle amoont o French an Latin lenwirds,

an it shaws that adopting French lenwirds has suithlie lang yearlaire an leid skeiring mint has been kythed rather newlins.

The fact that ane factor can mack manie ootcomes can be the traughle in troding the raison o the leid cheenges.

If we think aboot leids with wee records, even thinking something like this is alsae likelie-like:

Sin the raisons o ane leid cheenge can be maniefauld, sae if ye ettle at troding the raison o leid cheenges o a leid

whilk its ancestor recorded sair aff can be jist an imagination.

In hinderending, why a leid has been cheenged like the form spoken the day is hard tae find as there can be maniefauld factors

why it has been cheenged tae the form spoken the day.

Sometimes, some speakers o the leid can ettle at rekivering lots o features o the leid have else mizzled away.

Sae, finding the raison why a leid has been cheenged tae the form spoken the day is unlikelie

withoot the records o the forebeir leids, an troding the forebeir forms o leids dae nae have records

o their forebeirs is suthlie feckle